MacClausdoch….
1. Review
With much respect to the album (among my favorites) and without causing any offense to those who like the sound of the reissued disc—the sound is not so much to my liking. Heavily compressed, just like the other 2009 Stones remasters. I have done back-to-back comparisons of the 1994 Virgin remaster and this one with good equipment. The dynamics have been squeezed out, and I found myself reaching for the volume knob to turn the 2010 disc *down*–which is a real travesty for such a good-time rock record. Perhaps due to the compression and EQ choices, there seems to be a tad more detail, with more emphasis on the mid-range (this does bring out Mick’s vocals quite well, as others have said), but to my ears, the sound is harsh and fatiguing and a tad lifeless. I do wish this album would have been treated as lovingly as the 2002 ABKO re-issues, which are mind-blowingly good. I cannot comment on the bonus tracks just yet.2. Review
…
Genügend weitere vernichtende Klangkritik unter amazon.com
ja stimmt, die Amis sind da deutlich hilfreicher – ich meinte Amazon.de und da kannst die meisten Rezensionen bzgl. Aussagekraft bei Klangqualität vergessen…
--