Startseite › Foren › Über Bands, Solokünstler und Genres › Von Abba bis ZZ Top › The Rolling Stones › Re: The Rolling Stones
j.w.Es macht nichts daran den Eindruck, dass da was eilig zusammengestellt wurde. Wie kommst Du darauf.
Und das hier:
Apart from the poster and the vinyl wallet, the only other item in the box is the massive book, which fits snugly in place. Apart from a short foreword by Rolling Stone magazine co-founder Jann Wenner, photo captions, and CD track listings, there is no text at all in this book. No critical essays, no album-by-album assessments, and no personal contributions from any of the band.
After a dozen or so pages of black and white photos, laid out on uncoated paper, the meat of the book (68 pages to be precise) is made up of white glossy pages, each with a single photograph of some piece of Rolling Stones memorabilia. A radiocassette player used by Mick Jagger in 1975, a Charlie Watts flight case, or a promotional plastic harmonica. The whole thing has the feel of a Sotheby’s auction catalog – there is even a completely pointless memorabilia ‘index’ at the end where we see all the same photos again much smaller over a few pages.
In the end this set leaves you with a rather empty feeling. Five CDs and a seven inch record are not worth £100 and the giant book that has been created to try and give the illusion of value is, frankly, pointless. It doesn’t educate, inform, or even tell you something new about the band. It takes less than 3 minutes to flick through the content and with the one-photo-per-page approach, it looks like it could have been laid out in half a day.
——————————–
Hast Du die Box schon mal auf ihren Inhalt untersucht?
„Auf ihren Inhalt untersucht?“
--
Ohne Musik ist alles Leben ein Irrtum.