Na, ich weiß nicht. Zitat aus einem Interview, das er den progarchives im April gegeben hat (zum Thema Dream Theater):
„I’ve been very honest about my musical likes and dislikes in the press, and I even got in a heated discussion about going public with not being a fan of DT on your website.“
Was doch bedeutet, dass er gepostet haben muss, oder? Ich meine auch, irgendwo anders gelesen zu haben, dass er die Seite sehr mag und hin und wieder liest.
Das komplette Interview (wie gesagt aus dem April): http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=37160
Edit: Gefunden! Stammt sogar aus demselben Interview.
„On your website, I see people struggling
> to define what progressive is and to review albums under that premise
> – if it’s a good album but it’s not necessarily likely to appeal to a
> hardcore progressive fan, then should that get a lower rating? That’s
> crazy but I understand the dilemma. I think that’s the problem of
> trying to limit the scope on a music site. I love your site and check
> it out all the time, but I think progressive has become a much broader
> term than it was 5 years ago when we released In Absentia. Then I
> think it would have been the kiss of death to have promoted it using
> the word „progressive“. I mean I personally couldn’t care less, but
> in order to survive in this industry you certainly have to be aware of
> what kind of prejudices there are out there.“
--
C'mon Granddad!